Carrier tactic
“Pre-existing wear / pre-loss condition.” The structure was already degraded before the fire.
Our rebuttal
Carriers love a “this was already worn” finding on a NJ fire file because it places the loss outside the policy’s covered peril language. We rebut with date-stamped pre-loss photos, the licensed NJ source-of-loss report pegging the fire to a single event date, and the contractor’s pre-fire condition opinion. Once the system carried for years without failing on the date in question, “pre-existing wear” is a stretch the contract did not write.